Some of the games many of us bought left EA in condition which doesn't warrant calling it a "release", some are in EA for years and are getting better and better, some got abandoned in EA. Similarly with Empyrion, ARK, Colony Survival, Space Engineers, ECO and countless other. On example of Stationeers, pretty much all of the systems were revamped and often rebuilt from scratch, game is still amazing and being updated often. Would i be happier if they continued development? Yes. Mostly negative reviews deter future buyers but i had lots of fun with it. It's unfinished, it's not very exciting but the one thing i got it for, which is building massive and complex structures, works well and i often go back to it. Personally I've decided to not support any game unless it actually gets released, no pre orders, no early access, no betas, release the product and then I'll support it with my money.įor example Medieval Engineers was abandoned but despite being in perpetual Early Access, it does scratch that itch when it comes to building and a bit of mechanics+automation. Pretty sure one can find many other games fitting the same "early access" issue. See 7 days to die as another scummy example. Most of them fade away into nothingness or promise too many things at once and realise they can't deliver and turn into this Valheim-y type of game where content updates are promised and only 1 gets delivered per year (despite valheim making close to 100 m EUR in sales in 2021). There's about 1000 early access titles with terraforming, building, hunting, exploration that are trying to be the next "Minecraft".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |